I somehow managed to graduate from photojournalism school without ever hearing of one W. Eugene Smith. That, if you know anything about me, could be my most miraculous achievement. Still to this day I wonder how this was possible, but none the less, it was. Several years after graduation I was working for the Arizona Republic in Phoenix, hovering somewhere between photo-intern and “guy who just keeps showing up.” I picked up a chest cold but kept working, going out on daily assignments and also working on a story about Thai-style boxing that had just come to the Valley of the Sun. I got sicker and sicker and finally had to break down and visit the warzone that is county hospital, you know, the place we go when we don’t have insurance. After taking a chest X-RAY the doctor said, “First, I don’t know how you walked in here.” “And second, if you don’t go home right now and do nothing for ten days you will die.” Now I’m not an “A” student but that soundly relatively serious to me, so I went home to my rented room in downtown Phoenix and looked for sympathy. After about eighteen minutes, this was pre-internet “entertainment” people, I was so mind numbingly bored I began to dig around in the wooden box that held up the television. Inside I found this film. In short, my chest cold changed my life.

I was alone when I found the film, slipped it innocently into the state-of-the-art, 174-pound BETA machine and sat back with a nice hot glass of Hawaiian Punch. Within minutes I had forgotten about everything I had ever learned because what this film presented was an alternative universe, a vision and power I had never truly seen before. I watched the film then I started watching it again. My housemate came home and I vomited an indecipherable mess of panic, happiness, confusion and maybe a little more panic. What this film unveiled was a level of photography and commitment, a level that went well beyond “healthy,” and a set of images that were simply the most powerful documentary images I had ever seen.
Actor Peter Reigert portrays Smith while the film slowly features over 600 of Smith’s images. And, as interesting is the dialogue which comes directly from Smith’s diaries and letters, which by the way are honest and very well done. The film is rounded out with archival footage and interviews with family, friends and industry types. Now you might be thinking this is enough to endure watching the film dissected into nine parts on You Tube, and if you asked me I would say “Yes, it is TOTALLY worth it,” but there’s more. You can buy this film. My advice, buy it. You are gonna want to see it over and over again.
Now, I know there are some folks out there who might find reason to spoof this film, and feel free to do so, but you cannot deny what you are looking at when you see those images. In my mind Gene Smith was, and is, the best documentary photographer in American history, perhaps world history. Considering his tools, how minimal they were, and his materials and lack of outlets, he did SO MUCH it is hard for me to wrap my head around. As you will see, Smith was not without his faults, and according to some he was a complete and total ass***, but again his work lives as a testament to just how good and how committed he was. A quick example. He was assigned a project on Pittsburgh, which is one of my favorites, and the project owner thought he would get about thirty images over a two-week period. After many months and 10,000 GOOD images, Smith felt he wasn’t done. His “Country Doctor” story saw Smith spend twenty-three straight days with the doctor, and his “Midwife” story saw Smith spend six-weeks straight, day and night, with his subject. You see where I’m going with this? For Smith there was nothing else. There was no end. There was no compromise. Because of this his battles with Life Magazine were legendary.
I’ll leave you with one more thing. I’m a heartless bastard at times. I’m not this way on purpose, I just have the ability to bury my emotions. My wife has seen my cry once in sixteen years(When Battlefield Earth was snubbed for an Oscar). I watched “Photography Made Difficult” again last night, when the moon was full and the air was cold and crisp. Twice I felt like I was going to cry. I feel an emotional attachment to his work that I simply don’t feel with ANYONE else. I recently saw footage of some guy clubbing a baby harp seal and was like “I wonder what’s on Oprah?” Flatline people, NOTHING. But with this film I was riveted and emotionally attached. Forget about his content, which is supreme, just look at the LIGHT and the PRINTING. And again, he isn’t working with anything remotely cutting edge even though it was probably considered so at the time. I sat watching and was reminded once again about the only things that matter. Desire, direction, time in the field, light, timing and composition. These days I go into the field with multiple formats, color AND black and white film and a “to do” list that is WAY beyond what I need. This film is something I can’t hide from, and just knowing that this work is out there is a constant reminder of just how high the bar has been set.
Tagged: daniel milnor, Documentary, film, peter reigert, photographer, smogranch, w eugene smith

I watched this on YouTube some time ago. My jaw, which got slacker as it progressed, eventually crawled out the door, down 3 floors and almost met its end when two of the neighbour’s cats mistook it for afternoon tea.
Mild exaggeration aside, I was astounded by the film/man, and went back to the Dream Street book with a new appreciation for Gene Smith and his work. Anyone pursuing any sort of personal project, not just photographers, should watch this film. It’s another level of commitment altogether, along the lines of “your mission, should you choose to accept it…” Forget ideas like work-life balance and development (sorry, recovering corporate monkey) and throw yourself into it, head first, with everything you’ve got. And then stay there, like that.
Charlene,
Yes, I think he took commitment to another level.
Thanks for the post, the review of a very inspiring film, and the link to buy it
Bob,
What is amazing is the links on You Tube, the first segment has X amount of views, but by the time you get to the last it’s dropped way off. Same with Salgado film. Another reminder of what the internet is doing to our brain!
Soon after seing the film I looked for a book with images. I bought a very small retrospective book by Sam Stephenson (published by Phaidon) which I really enjoyed: isbn: 0-7148-4035-1 . Sam Stephenson has published several other works about Eugene Smith ( see http://samstephenson.org) and he’s director of the Jazz Loft Project http://www.jazzloftproject.org/
Simone
Simone,
Minimata is a classic. Jazz is good to.
His way of speaking is dramatic, archaic, pedantic. He is irritated that others don’t “get” it. Not charming and cuddly for sure. He dismisses lazy photographers and purist photographers alike. For him, it is about doing what is necessary to draw attention to what matters and to lose the rest, in order to honour the subject. Being his assistant must have been a kind of hell - but work experience to die for. Asked for his advice to photographers still learning, he advises that they should go for a walk with the sun in their eyes, making sure that as well as looking they also see. Note, not a word about a camera.
Lionel,
I don’t think he cared about the camera, just like most of the greats. I’ve certainly never had a conversation with a “legend” where the conversation went toward equipment. It just doesn’t matter. I think Smith had a desperation to him. He would have used anything he could get his hands on because he needed to get it out.
Dan,
To me, his images are difficult too. No uncertainty, no humour, rarely any tenderness. He was determined for example to show the Guardia Civil as cruel (which of course they were) when for me the more interesting thing − the more subtle thing − would have been to show their prosaic side, their vulnerability. His view of the world is cut and dried though, black-and-white.
Lionel,
I think this is why we can have ten photographers cover the same story and get ten different takes. Also, it’s difficult to know what was really going on. The Guardia might have been cold, hard and distrusting and their vulnerable side might not have been possible at that point.
I’m pretty new to your blog and have been enjoying it but this was really great. Gene Smith was the first photographer I got into when I started shooting back in ’98. Found a used copy of Let Truth Be The Prejudice, which contains a pretty solid biography on Smith and it blew my mind. Not only his work but the near insane level of dedication to his craft. Had never seen this documentary before, thanks for sharing.
Greer,
He was THE guy, at least in my humble opinion. I think about all the things I”ve done, none of which have come close to what he did in a single project, and wonder how he did it. I also think most of what we see today in the “cutting edge” world of photojournalism was done by Smith and done better. Just seeing his images and hearing his words, for me, is far more powerful than anything I see today.
W. Eugene Smith was great inspiration to me when I was in college (pre-digital era). Let Truth Be The Prejudice is one of my favorite books. I haven’t seen Photography Made Difficult yet. Thanks for posting about him.
Mei-Chun,
I think what Smith did is a good lesson for anyone. The way he saw light, and the way he printed are things that will apply forever. If you notice in the film, the VAST majority of images you see where made in great light, and even those made in harsh light, Spanish Village, are printed to accentuate the light. Just that alone is reason to watch this film and reason to pull a little residue from him when you are in the field or in the darkroom.
Daniel, thanks for sharing your story and this video.
I wonder if Smith’s diaries and letters are available. Have they been published in a book or something? I think it will be very interesting and inspiring to read these.
Serge,
Great question. I thought his journals and letters were great because they were honest. “I’ve got a big talent.” People might read that the wrong way, but at least he was honest enough to put it out there. As a journal keeper of 20 years, I’ve always told people you have to write as if nobody will ever see the pages because otherwise it’s just propaganda. The truth shall set you free.
Daniel: Thanks for this post appreciating the brilliance of W. Eugene Smith who was one of my best friends and co-conspirators. Yes it is outratgeous that you went through photojournalism school and never heard of him and yes he was one of the greatest, most committed and ultimately underappreciated masters of photography ever.
I was a young Photo League photographer when my friend Arnold Newman recommended I seek out Smith. He said: “He’s crazy, but he’s great.” How true. A deep friendship ensured including my producing the lay-out for his massive Pittsburgh Project.
I was one of the original dwellers of the now famous “jazz loft” on 821 6th Ave. in NYC and Gene took my loft when I needed to move out. The book done by Sam Stephenson at Duke University called “The Jazz Loft” is about his tapes from that scene. Sam interviewed me about my association with Gene here:
http://www.cdsporch.org/archives/12758, and later produced this film called “Brilliant Fever” about Gene’s Pittsburg Project: http://humanitydocs.com/brilliant_fever_doc_qt.html
At 82, I look back on my long life as a photographer — still going strong — and count Gene as one of small handful of the truly great people I have known. Gene seems destined to be known inspite of all the people who refused to acknowledge his greatness — but that brilliance is simply irretubable. I miss him dearly.
Here are a few of my own posts referring to Gene that your readers might enjoy.
http://www.haroldfeinstein.com/reminiscences-of-w-eugene-smith/
http://www.haroldfeinstein.com/jazz-for-the-soul-blue-note-records-the-jazz-loft-and-eric-in-the-evening/
Harold,
What an honor. Thank you so much for writing, and thank you for all the subsequent information. I can’t tell you how much I’ve been thinking about that film and his images. Last weekend I drove the New Mexico/Mexico border and I could not stop asking myself “What would Gene do?” And this, for me, is foreign territory. Again, thank you so much. Great to meet a friend of Gene’s. I going to look you up then pester you about meeting so I can hear more……..
You can pester me anytime…glad to hear from you.
Harold,
I emailed you earlier….
“My wife has seen my cry once in sixteen years(When Battlefield Earth was snubbed for an Oscar)…”
bahaha as the only person who saw this movie in australia i sympathise!!
Totally worth crying over.
Well Dan, thank you as always for telling another great story and letting us know about an unbelievable person. I have to say I feel a spiritual connection with Harold showing up here that is way beyond an internet coincidence. I think Eugene just reached out to shine a little of that amazing back light down on Smogranch!
Okay, I’m back….and now need to catch up on your new style of rapid fire posting(s)….give a brother time to get up off the floor and breathe again.
Jason,
yes, was very happy that Harold checked in. What a find. I’m posting every eight minutes now, get used to it.
Thanks for the recommendation. Youtube also has the entire American Masters episode on Stieglitz at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wMxxgYrT2PQ.